GIN, KOTA BANDUNG – Deputy Chairperson of the Bandung District Court HERA KARTININGSIH, S.H., M.H. who became the Chairperson of the Panel of Judges at the follow-up trial of the PRO DNA Victims which took place at the Bandung District Court, Wednesday (January 11, 2023). The DNA PRO case received special attention from the public. Assets received from the defendants through the demands of the public prosecutor if granted by the panel of judges Henceforth Mr. Hd as a victim who is accompanied by a team of Attorney WLP Law Firm Jonathan Simangunsong, S.H. conveyed “Hopefully we who are victims of this DNA Pro trading robot investment can get justice through compensation to restore us as victims which, if it can be granted by the panel of judges, Your Honor.” The results of today’s trial are as follows: 1. The reading of the Charges is carried out briefly and directly in the Petitum section of the Public Prosecutor’s Charges; 2. The Defendants were charged with Article 105 of Law Number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade in conjunction with Article 55 of the Criminal Code and Article 3 in conjunction with Article 10 of Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning TPPU; 3. Matters aggravating the Defendants: – the defendant’s actions have harmed the victims (members) of DNA PRO; – the defendant’s actions disturbed the wider community; – the defendants have enjoyed the proceeds of the crime for their luxurious lifestyle. 4. Matters mitigating the defendants: – the assets obtained from the defendants are used to compensate the victims (members) DNA pro; – the defendants behaved politely during the trial; – the accused have never been convicted. 5. The charges against the Defendants Daniel Abe and Dedi Tumaidi are as follows: – Declare the defendants Daniel Abe and Dedi Tumaidi proven legally and convincingly according to law “together carry out a pyramid system scheme in distributing goods” as regulated and threatened with Article 105 of Law Number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade Jo Article 55 paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code (indictment alternative 1) and “the crime of jointly committing money laundering” as regulated and threatened by Article 3 in conjunction with Article 10 of Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Crime of Money Laundering (second alternative indictment); – Sentenced a sentence against the Defendants Daniel Abe and Dedi Tumaidi in the form of a 3 (three) year prison sentence deducted from the detention period already served by the Defendants with an order that the defendants remain in custody; – Imposing fines of 4 billion Rupiah to each Defendant with the provision that if the fine is not paid it will be replaced with imprisonment for 1 year for each Defendant; – Determines that the evidence listed in claim number 1-361 is used for An’s case. the defendants Rudy Kusuma, Jerry Gunandar, Rudy Kusuma and Yosua Tri Sutrisno; – Charged the defendants to pay court costs of Rp. 5,000; 6. The charges against the Defendant Rudy Kusuma et al are as follows: – Declare that the Defendants Rudy Kusuma, Jerry Gunandar, Russel, and Yosua Try Sutrisno have been proven legally and convincingly according to law “together carry out a pyramid system scheme in distributing goods” as stipulated and threatened with Article 105 of Law Number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade Jo Article 55 paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code (1st alternative charge) and “the crime of jointly committing money laundering” as regulated and threatened by Article 3 in conjunction with Article 10 of Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Crime of Money Laundering (second alternative charge); – Convict Rudy Kusuma, Jerry Gunandar, Russel, andYosua Try Sutrisno in the form of imprisonment for 3 years minus the detention period already served by the defendants with an order that the defendants remain detained; – Sentenced to Rudy Kusuma, Jerry Gunandar, Russel, and Yosua Try Sutrisno in the form of a fine of 3 billion Rupiah with the provision that if the fine is not carried out it will be replaced with 1 year imprisonment; – Determined that the evidence listed in claim number 1-362 (attached to the charge) was used for An’s case. the defendants Stefanus Richard, Roby Setiadi, Andre Martinus Supit, and Frengky Nurdian; – Charged the defendant to pay court fees of IDR 2,000 7. The charges against the Defendants Stefanus Richard, Roby Setiadi, Andre Martinus Supit, and Frengky Nurdian are as follows: – Declare the Defendants Stefanus Richard, Roby Setiadi, Andre Martinus Supit, and Frengky Nurdian proven legally and convincingly according to law “together assisting the pyramid system scheme in distributing goods” as stipulated and threatened with article Article 105 of Law Number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade Jo Article 55 paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code (1st alternative charge) and “the crime of jointly assisting in money laundering” as regulated and threatened by Article 3 in conjunction with Article 10 of Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Crime of Money Laundering (second alternative charge); – sentenced the Defendants Stefanus Richard, Roby Setiadi, Andre Martinus Supit, and Frengky Nurdian in the form of 2 years in prison each cut by the prison terms that the Defendants had passed with an order that the defendants remain in detention; – Imposing fines to each of the Defendants of 2 billion Rupiah with the provision that if they are not carried out they are replaced with 1 year imprisonment; – Determining that the evidence in the form of Number 303 (attached to the claim) was confiscated for the state and will then be auctioned off, the results will be returned to the Victims through the Association; – determine that evidence numbers 304 to 361 (attached to the claim) are returned to the victim proportionally through association; – determines that evidence number 302 (attached to the claim) was confiscated for the state to be auctioned and the results will be returned to the victim through the association; – Charged the defendants each to pay court fees of IDR 5,000 Mr. Haji Ssi and Mr. Hd, who suffered losses from this DNA pro, said, “I hope that the community will not be easily tempted to invest their money in investments like this DNA PRO, which causes many victims.” “We, the victims, really believe and believe that the Honorable Panel of Judges will decide with conscience so that the confiscated assets and funds can be returned to the victims and we, as victims of DNA Pro, hope for justice and get back what we have invested in DNA Pro,” concluded Accompanied hd. Mr. Ssi with a face full of sadness.
